Home Page
12.16.2004
 Digital Libraries 
The newspapers this week headlined a deal by which Google will gang with a gaggle of universities to digitize their library collections. According to the NYT (Dec 14), Google will ante up the money, about $10 each for 15 million books.

Google describes the project as:

Users searching with Google will see links in their search results page when there are books relevant to their query. Clicking on a title delivers a Google Print page where users can browse the full text of public domain works and brief excerpts and/or bibliographic data of copyrighted material. Library content will be displayed in keeping with copyright law. For more information and examples, please visit http://print.google.com/googleprint/library.html.
Copyright will be observed. Google says:

We respect the rights of copyright holders and the tremendous creative effort of authors. Library books that are still in copyright will show up in search results, but users will only see bibliographic information and a few small text snippets until we get permission from publishers to show more.
According to the WSJ (Dec.14, 2004)(subscription required), publishers are likely to hop on board, seeing this as a way to sell backlist books, and impressed with favorable experiences with Amazon's search-inside-the-book.

Google may actually see this as a money-making opportunity, if it can sell advertising along with the links.

It is doubtful that Google will have the field to itself, though. Amazon already digitizes books, over 120,000 so far, and it is not likely to stand by. Nor will Microsoft and Yahoo be willing to cede the field to Google.

This possibility of competation raises an interesting issue. No publisher or library is likely to give exclusive rights over the books to Google. But who will own the digital image produced with Google cash? Will the library own it, and thus have the ability to re-share it with, say, Amazon? Or will Google own it, and thus be able to force Amazon, Microsoft, etc., each to pay for re-scanning the book?

That would be a sight -- a battery of scanning machines lined up in a row, with each book scanned multitudinous times. It sounds ridiculous, but, on the other hand, forced sharing doesn't work either, because then the first mover gets no reward for runnning the risk of total failure. (Viz., the telecom industry and UNE-P.)

It is indeed a conundrum, one of the many to be solved along the road to digital utopia.

posted by James DeLong : 12/16/2004 10:42:46 AM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  FTC Act: Failure To Courageously Act
P2P Roundup
The FASB Rolls On
The Pharma Front
MPAA Escalates
Software Copyrights
Who Steals Movies?
Telecom & Property Rights
Santa's Real Helpers
Who Hates Child Porn More?
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page IPcentral Weblog - Intellectual Property and Copyright Commentary
Home Page
12.16.2004
 Digital Libraries 
The newspapers this week headlined a deal by which Google will gang with a gaggle of universities to digitize their library collections. According to the NYT (Dec 14), Google will ante up the money, about $10 each for 15 million books.

Google describes the project as:

Users searching with Google will see links in their search results page when there are books relevant to their query. Clicking on a title delivers a Google Print page where users can browse the full text of public domain works and brief excerpts and/or bibliographic data of copyrighted material. Library content will be displayed in keeping with copyright law. For more information and examples, please visit http://print.google.com/googleprint/library.html.
Copyright will be observed. Google says:

We respect the rights of copyright holders and the tremendous creative effort of authors. Library books that are still in copyright will show up in search results, but users will only see bibliographic information and a few small text snippets until we get permission from publishers to show more.
According to the WSJ (Dec.14, 2004)(subscription required), publishers are likely to hop on board, seeing this as a way to sell backlist books, and impressed with favorable experiences with Amazon's search-inside-the-book.

Google may actually see this as a money-making opportunity, if it can sell advertising along with the links.

It is doubtful that Google will have the field to itself, though. Amazon already digitizes books, over 120,000 so far, and it is not likely to stand by. Nor will Microsoft and Yahoo be willing to cede the field to Google.

This possibility of competation raises an interesting issue. No publisher or library is likely to give exclusive rights over the books to Google. But who will own the digital image produced with Google cash? Will the library own it, and thus have the ability to re-share it with, say, Amazon? Or will Google own it, and thus be able to force Amazon, Microsoft, etc., each to pay for re-scanning the book?

That would be a sight -- a battery of scanning machines lined up in a row, with each book scanned multitudinous times. It sounds ridiculous, but, on the other hand, forced sharing doesn't work either, because then the first mover gets no reward for runnning the risk of total failure. (Viz., the telecom industry and UNE-P.)

It is indeed a conundrum, one of the many to be solved along the road to digital utopia.

posted by James DeLong : 12/16/2004 10:42:46 AM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  FTC Act: Failure To Courageously Act
P2P Roundup
The FASB Rolls On
The Pharma Front
MPAA Escalates
Software Copyrights
Who Steals Movies?
Telecom & Property Rights
Santa's Real Helpers
Who Hates Child Porn More?
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page