Home Page
10.25.2004
 Posner on Law Reviews 
Judge Richard Posner has an article entitled "Against Law Reviews," in Legal Affairs: The magazine at the intersection of law and life.

The subtitle is: "Welcome to a world where inexperienced editors make articles about the wrong topics worse."

It is a a good and sober look at a serious problem - that "The result of the system of scholarly publication in law is that too many articles are too long, too dull, and too heavily annotated, and that many interdisciplinary articles are published that have no merit at all." He is particularly critical of articles in the "law and . . . ." fields.

Since much of the national discussion of intellectual property is filtered through this system of law review publication, it is a serious problem for IP in particular.

The link is from Houston's Clear Thinkers, via Marginal Revolution.

For some amen comments from a law prof, see here.

posted by James DeLong : 10/25/2004 01:17:00 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Bush & Kerry on P2P
Patents, Litigation and Innovation
The New Business Model Argument Again
Hal Varian reviews Jaffe and Lerner book
IP Law as Regulation
Tom Lenard on Larry Lessig on Ronald Coase
More iPod Innovation
MP3 Losing Steam from CNET
Halo 2 Leak Meta-Analysis
Grokster & Cert
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page IPcentral Weblog - Intellectual Property and Copyright Commentary
Home Page
10.25.2004
 Posner on Law Reviews 
Judge Richard Posner has an article entitled "Against Law Reviews," in Legal Affairs: The magazine at the intersection of law and life.

The subtitle is: "Welcome to a world where inexperienced editors make articles about the wrong topics worse."

It is a a good and sober look at a serious problem - that "The result of the system of scholarly publication in law is that too many articles are too long, too dull, and too heavily annotated, and that many interdisciplinary articles are published that have no merit at all." He is particularly critical of articles in the "law and . . . ." fields.

Since much of the national discussion of intellectual property is filtered through this system of law review publication, it is a serious problem for IP in particular.

The link is from Houston's Clear Thinkers, via Marginal Revolution.

For some amen comments from a law prof, see here.

posted by James DeLong : 10/25/2004 01:17:00 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Bush & Kerry on P2P
Patents, Litigation and Innovation
The New Business Model Argument Again
Hal Varian reviews Jaffe and Lerner book
IP Law as Regulation
Tom Lenard on Larry Lessig on Ronald Coase
More iPod Innovation
MP3 Losing Steam from CNET
Halo 2 Leak Meta-Analysis
Grokster & Cert
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page