Home Page
7.1.2004
 Intel Corrects a Typo on H.R. 107: "Change That 'Yes' to 'No' " 
Last week's report on H.R. 107 had a link to the Personal Technology Freedom Coalition, a newly-formed group of supporters of the bill. The list of supporters included Intel.

But, according to the Washington Internet Daily [subscription required], there was a small mistake -- Intel does not support the bill, because it "has concerns about some of its more controversial components, particularly permitting one to circumvent copy-protection mechanisms for non-infringing uses." (That's WID paraphrasing an Intel spokesperson.)

Intel does agree with some provisions of H.R. 107, such as labeling. But these are non-controversial. Everyone is in favor of appropriate labeling (though the necessity of legislation is dubious.)

So Intel is not "proactively lobbying for the bill at this time." (WID quoting Intel directly.)

The correction is nice, but it would be nicer if Intel took the next step, and proactively took the position that destroying the possibility of digital rights management is destructive of the company's, and the nation's, true interests.

posted by James DeLong : 7/1/2004 09:41:31 AM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Blogging as Corporate Communication
Under Capricorn
ICAC Panel on the DMCA
Inducing Infringement
Open Source & Free Riding
More on Railroads & Software
This Summer's Horror Flick: "It's from the Federal Government, and It's Coming to Help Us"
H.R. 107: Continued
H.R 107: Further Request for Enlightenment
"Shorter patent lives mean shorter lives"
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page IPcentral Weblog - Intellectual Property and Copyright Commentary
Home Page
7.1.2004
 Intel Corrects a Typo on H.R. 107: "Change That 'Yes' to 'No' " 
Last week's report on H.R. 107 had a link to the Personal Technology Freedom Coalition, a newly-formed group of supporters of the bill. The list of supporters included Intel.

But, according to the Washington Internet Daily [subscription required], there was a small mistake -- Intel does not support the bill, because it "has concerns about some of its more controversial components, particularly permitting one to circumvent copy-protection mechanisms for non-infringing uses." (That's WID paraphrasing an Intel spokesperson.)

Intel does agree with some provisions of H.R. 107, such as labeling. But these are non-controversial. Everyone is in favor of appropriate labeling (though the necessity of legislation is dubious.)

So Intel is not "proactively lobbying for the bill at this time." (WID quoting Intel directly.)

The correction is nice, but it would be nicer if Intel took the next step, and proactively took the position that destroying the possibility of digital rights management is destructive of the company's, and the nation's, true interests.

posted by James DeLong : 7/1/2004 09:41:31 AM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Blogging as Corporate Communication
Under Capricorn
ICAC Panel on the DMCA
Inducing Infringement
Open Source & Free Riding
More on Railroads & Software
This Summer's Horror Flick: "It's from the Federal Government, and It's Coming to Help Us"
H.R. 107: Continued
H.R 107: Further Request for Enlightenment
"Shorter patent lives mean shorter lives"
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page