Home Page
4.7.2004
 Digital Rights Management 
Mike Godwin, Senior Technology Counsel of Public Knowledge, has published What Every Citizen Should Know about DRM, a.k.a. "Digital Rights Management," a useful and sobering primer on the technical and policy complexities of DRM.

I don't agree with all of his policy views -- in particular, I think definitions of fair use should be malleable (both ways) in the light of technological change -- but I share Mike's fear of government regulatory schemes, and I certainly amen his statement: "Most of us believe that artists and authors deserve to be compensated, and even that publishers deserve compensation for bringing them to us. At the same time, it is a natural human impulse to share the creative works we love. . . . The question before us, then, is how to harness both the technical ingenuity behind DRM and the human drive to share the works that we enjoy in a way that leverages the best from both."
posted by James DeLong : 4/7/2004 02:08:37 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Network Effects
Stock Options: Its Over Power & Money, Not Good Accounting
File-Sharing and Market Power
Imperial Canada
More on File-Sharing Study
Database Protection
Sauce for the Gander Department
Catchup on NYT v. The National Debate
Asking the Right Question
Lessig & DeLong Debate
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page IPcentral Weblog - Intellectual Property and Copyright Commentary
Home Page
4.7.2004
 Digital Rights Management 
Mike Godwin, Senior Technology Counsel of Public Knowledge, has published What Every Citizen Should Know about DRM, a.k.a. "Digital Rights Management," a useful and sobering primer on the technical and policy complexities of DRM.

I don't agree with all of his policy views -- in particular, I think definitions of fair use should be malleable (both ways) in the light of technological change -- but I share Mike's fear of government regulatory schemes, and I certainly amen his statement: "Most of us believe that artists and authors deserve to be compensated, and even that publishers deserve compensation for bringing them to us. At the same time, it is a natural human impulse to share the creative works we love. . . . The question before us, then, is how to harness both the technical ingenuity behind DRM and the human drive to share the works that we enjoy in a way that leverages the best from both."
posted by James DeLong : 4/7/2004 02:08:37 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Network Effects
Stock Options: Its Over Power & Money, Not Good Accounting
File-Sharing and Market Power
Imperial Canada
More on File-Sharing Study
Database Protection
Sauce for the Gander Department
Catchup on NYT v. The National Debate
Asking the Right Question
Lessig & DeLong Debate
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page