Home Page
3.30.2004
 Catchup on NYT v. The National Debate 
The parody NYT columnist correction page put up by The National Debate was discussed here and here.

While I was out of town, the parties settled their differences. The NYT acknowledged that as long as the site had a disclaimer, it had no further concerns about possible confusion and TND put up such a notice. Log on to TND and scroll down to March 15.

Also, Daniel Okrent, the NYT's Public Editor, made a wry comment on the imbroglio:

"Anyone who calls the Internet's bustling trade in columnist-attack a cottage industry might more accurately liken it to the arms bazaar in Peshawar. Peace and calm were not enhanced a few weeks ago when Times lawyers took a legal sledgehammer to an imaginary Op-Ed corrections column published by Robert Cox of the Web site The National Debate - but peace and calm rarely accompany arguments about political opinion in a polarized age."
posted by James DeLong : 3/30/2004 02:24:55 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Asking the Right Question
Lessig & DeLong Debate
Programmers and Open Source Software
More on the NYT/National Debate copyright controversy
And in This Corner -- Ink vs. Photon
IP as Capital: Yoda Speaks
The Wealth of (Creative) Nations
Computer Games
Et tu, Glenn?
Eldred and Economics
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page IPcentral Weblog - Intellectual Property and Copyright Commentary
Home Page
3.30.2004
 Catchup on NYT v. The National Debate 
The parody NYT columnist correction page put up by The National Debate was discussed here and here.

While I was out of town, the parties settled their differences. The NYT acknowledged that as long as the site had a disclaimer, it had no further concerns about possible confusion and TND put up such a notice. Log on to TND and scroll down to March 15.

Also, Daniel Okrent, the NYT's Public Editor, made a wry comment on the imbroglio:

"Anyone who calls the Internet's bustling trade in columnist-attack a cottage industry might more accurately liken it to the arms bazaar in Peshawar. Peace and calm were not enhanced a few weeks ago when Times lawyers took a legal sledgehammer to an imaginary Op-Ed corrections column published by Robert Cox of the Web site The National Debate - but peace and calm rarely accompany arguments about political opinion in a polarized age."
posted by James DeLong : 3/30/2004 02:24:55 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Asking the Right Question
Lessig & DeLong Debate
Programmers and Open Source Software
More on the NYT/National Debate copyright controversy
And in This Corner -- Ink vs. Photon
IP as Capital: Yoda Speaks
The Wealth of (Creative) Nations
Computer Games
Et tu, Glenn?
Eldred and Economics
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page