Home Page
1.27.2004
 It's not over 'til it's over 
Everyone who follows the IP business knows about RIAA v. Verizon -- the D.C. Circuit ruling that section 512(h) of the DMCA does not empower a copyright holder to lay a subpoena on an ISP demanding the identity of an unauthorized P2P music downloader, unless it has already filed formal legal action against an unknown "John Doe."

It turns out that the issue is not closed. RIAA subpoenas are also being litigated in the 4th and 8th Circuits, and in those venues the industry is arguing that the D.C. Circuit was wrong. The cases are still at the trial level, or at preliminary stages of appeal, so briefs are not yet available, but the crux of the RIAA's argument can be found in the opinion of the district court that was reversed by the D.C. Circuit. Also, the industry has not yet decided whether it will seek rehearing en banc or Supreme Court review of RIAA v. Verizon.

An analysis of the issues, written before the D.C. Circuit decision, is here. Many experts were surprised by the D.C. Circuit decision, so the other circuits could come to a different conclusion.

posted by James DeLong : 1/27/2004 04:30:24 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Compulsory licenses
iTunes: Time's "Coolest Invention of the Year"
Run! Its an Election Year!
Shut those eyes!
Verizon v. Trinko: The Limits of Antitrust
Carly Fiorina: Singing in Harmony
Homer Nods
File Sharing
Milken Institute Review
"Fair Use" Barbie
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page IPcentral Weblog - Intellectual Property and Copyright Commentary
Home Page
1.27.2004
 It's not over 'til it's over 
Everyone who follows the IP business knows about RIAA v. Verizon -- the D.C. Circuit ruling that section 512(h) of the DMCA does not empower a copyright holder to lay a subpoena on an ISP demanding the identity of an unauthorized P2P music downloader, unless it has already filed formal legal action against an unknown "John Doe."

It turns out that the issue is not closed. RIAA subpoenas are also being litigated in the 4th and 8th Circuits, and in those venues the industry is arguing that the D.C. Circuit was wrong. The cases are still at the trial level, or at preliminary stages of appeal, so briefs are not yet available, but the crux of the RIAA's argument can be found in the opinion of the district court that was reversed by the D.C. Circuit. Also, the industry has not yet decided whether it will seek rehearing en banc or Supreme Court review of RIAA v. Verizon.

An analysis of the issues, written before the D.C. Circuit decision, is here. Many experts were surprised by the D.C. Circuit decision, so the other circuits could come to a different conclusion.

posted by James DeLong : 1/27/2004 04:30:24 PM

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

IPcentral WebLog
Blog Main
Recent Posts
  Compulsory licenses
iTunes: Time's "Coolest Invention of the Year"
Run! Its an Election Year!
Shut those eyes!
Verizon v. Trinko: The Limits of Antitrust
Carly Fiorina: Singing in Harmony
Homer Nods
File Sharing
Milken Institute Review
"Fair Use" Barbie
Archives by Month
  December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
Links
  PFF Blog
Atom.xml Site Feed
   
 
Home Page